Showing posts with label debate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label debate. Show all posts

Sunday, 1 April 2012

MY DEBATE EXPERIENCE AND MY REAL OPINION ABOUT ABORTION


Abortion – an ethical act?

 

The last sentence was the motion of the debate that took place last Friday on my English class, of which I was a part of. We had to talk about whether we thought abortion was an ethical thing to do in case of an unexpected or an unwanted pregnancy. We were to discuss the facts, opinions, statistics, etc., that we researched and thought were crucial at the moment of knowing you are pregnant, and want to make an informed decision. 

I belonged to the team that supported the motion, which means that we were defending the act of abortion. We had approximately 6 days to prepare for our debate, and honestly none of us wanted to go on with the debate because we were really nervous, we thought it was very little time to get prepared. But still we went on with the debate, and had a really good experience. I think we got a little carried away and got really into it, but then again, that was the whole idea, to defend your motion as well as you could.

To make this debate we had different motions, and my main motion was malformations during pregnancy and how it gets mixed with religion. This means, the different points of view and opinions the different religions have on abortion depending on the case. 

My main focus was on the Jewish religion, which is the most flexible on this case. According to the Jewish Talmud and the Encyclopedia of Jewish Medical Ethics, a mother can abort its fetus it she is in danger of death, if multiple fetuses compromise the mother’s health, and if the product is less than 40 days old, as it is only considered just fluid.  

What amazed me the most is the flexibility of other religions compared to the Catholic one. Some of them allow an abortion when the baby is product of a violation, some of them if the mother is in danger of death, and some of them have a debate to see if the request is valid and acceptable for abortion.

Apart from this I also made statements about Women’s rights for complete freedom.   

But even though we found some really good argument on the internet, that were enough to make the audience decide that those of us going for the motion had a better outcome, I would like to say that I am not pro-abortion. I think that you cannot have a really valid opinion until you have been on that position and even less judge a person for taking whichever decision she felt comfortable with.

Everyone can have an opinion on abortion, but then again, who are we to judge on something we don't know?

Monday, 5 March 2012

Group 1: Debates and Presentations

Motion 1:  Drug use should be legalised in Mexico.
For the motion:  Ruben, Yessica, Miguel Ramos, Oscar
Against the motion:  Ana Karen, Lilia, Alis, Cristina Castro

Motion 2:  Abortion should stay illegal in Sonora
For the motion:  Valeria, Diana, Diego
Against the motion:  Erika, Addan, Sahandra

Motion 3:  Caffeine is good for you.
For the motion:  Ramon, Alexia, Esteban
Against the motion:  Rodrigo, Jose, Salvador, Martha, Alan

Motion 4:  Are school uniforms a good or bad idea?
For the motion:  Irma Perez, Karem Martinez, Nancy Quintana
Against the motion:  Jose Luis Hoyos, Itzel, Sherlyn

Presentation:  Drugs
Ruben, Yessica, Lilia, Ana Karen Garcia

Presentation:  A country-comparison of abortion practices
Team 1:  Valeria, Diana, Diego
Team 2:  Erika, Addan, Sahandra

Presentation:  Abortion
Cristina Castro, Alis Villegas

Presentation:  Caffeine
Team 1:  Ramon, Alexia, Esteban
Team 2:  Rodrigo, Jose, Salvador, Martha, Alan

Presentation:  School Uniforms
Team 1:  Irma Perez, Karem Martinez, Nancy Quintana
Team 2:  Jose Luis Hoyos, Itzel, Sherlyn

Group 2: Debate

Motion 1:  Videogames are detrimental to a child's educational, social and psychological development.

For the motion:  Sofia, Lili
Against the motion:  Adriana, Irlanda

Group 3: Debates

Motion 1:  Abortion - an unethical act?

For the motion:  Julio Cesar, Veronica,  Sergio, Samantha Gonzalo
Against the motion:  Daniela, Daniel, Tanya, Abigail, Jackie

Motion 2:  Is Article 10 of the Mexican Constitution still relevant and necessary?

For the motion:  Gloria, Delia
Against the motion:  Ignacio, Janeth

Motion 3:  Social networks are detrimental to teenagers' educational, social and psychological development.

For the motion:  Cristina, Gabriel
Against the motion:  Belen, Alfonso

Thursday, 1 March 2012

Debate Motions and Teams (Group 2)

Motion:  Videogames are detrimental to a child's educational, social and psychological development.


FOR THE MOTION:   Adriana and Irlanda

AGAINST THE MOTION:  Lili and Sofia